| Rear-facing |
|
What is "rear-facing"?
Rear-facing is the term used to refer to the direction of which an infant, toddler or young child faces. That is, towards the back of the vehicle. What is "extended" rear-facing?
"Extended" rear-facing is often the term used to describe a child who rear-faces past one year of age. To what age is it recommended to rear-face?
It is recommended to rear-face for a minimum of one year of age. This reccomendation is backed by the Land Transport Safety Authority , Child Safety Foundation New Zealand , Safekids (worldwide), Safe2G0 , Plunket , the American Academy of Pediatrics , The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) , NHTSA and many more organisations throughout the world. All child passenger safety experts recognise the importance of rear-facing children particularly for that ever important first year of life. The American Academy of Pediatrics however takes it one step further and reccommends that children ride in the rear-facing position until they're at least 2, though preferably until the rear-facing weight and height limitations of their child safety seat.
Whilst rear-facing till one year of age might seem like some new fandangled reccomendation that popped out of thin air, this information has been repeated throughout New Zealand since at least the year 2000. Further more, children in Sweden have ridden rear-facing for a number of years and for quite some time Sweden has "led the way" in regards to rear-facing restraints and safety practices. Children in Sweden generally ride rear facing until they are three to five years old or as much as 25kg (55lbs), lowering traffic death and injury rates in Sweden considerably. It is uncommon to turn a child to forward-facing before these ages. "From 1992 through June 1997, only 9 children properly restrained rear-facing died in motor vehicle crashes in Sweden, and all of these involved catastrophic crashes with severe intrusion and few other survivors." (source: CPSAFETY).
Rear-facing is now catching on and taking off in other countries throughout the world such as Norway, Denmark, Finland, the USA, Canada, Sweden of course and now New Zealand. Why is rear-facing safer?
Research has shown that rear-facing child restraints provide greater protection for children in the event of frontal/frontal offset and side impacts. Frontal/frontal offset crashes are by far the most frequent type of crash and are usually of much more severity then any other type of impact. According to accident statistics from Autoliv N.Z. Ltd frontal and frontal offset impacts account for 65.1% of fatal injuries in motor vehicle crashes and side impacts 29%. Because these types of crashes account for the majority of fatalities and injuries in motor vehicle crashes, this is why statistically the longer you rear-face, the better, it's called "best practice".
While some rear-facing restraints may not perform as well in rear impacts, it must be noted that rear and rear offset impacts account for approximately only 5.9% of fatal injuries in motor vehicle crashes and are usually of far, far less severity then frontal impacts. This is because typically in a frontal crash there are two vehicles travelling in opposite directions at high speeds. When these two cars collide with each other, both stop very abruptly, in a fraction of a second, with a tremendous amount of force and energy. Or, it may be just the one vehicle travelling at high speed and colliding with a stationary object. Rear impacts however most often occur when one vehicle has stopped (say at an intersection) and another car hits it from behind and usually this is at a very low speed, often causing minimal damage. Of course, severe rear-impacts do occur, but as discussed above, are far less common then frontal and side impacts.
The most important parts of a child that we need to protect are the head, neck and spine. Rear-facing is the best protection for all of these important body parts. The rear-facing child has the frontal crash forces spread over their back, head and neck (a large portion of the body) in a crash. The rear-facing child is also supported by the back shell of the car seat meaning there is little stretching of the neck. However, how a forward-facing child is restrained is quite a contrast to that of a rear-facing child. In a frontal crash, the forward-facing child's torso is restrained by their harness straps. The head of the child however is restrained by nothing and thrusts violently forward, this places them at a much greater risk of serious head, neck and spinal cord injuries resulting in death or paralysis.
As above, an infants heads is relatively large in relation to their body. In fact, an infant's head accounts for approximately twenty five percent of the child's body mass. This is a far cry from the mere six percent of body mass for a developed adult. Children are "top heavy" which is why they are far more susceptible to injury, in particular head, neck and spinal injuries.
When the heavy head of the forward-facing child is thrust forward in an accident, this puts an enormous amount of stress on the child's neck, which is trying to hold back the head. The heavy weight of the child's head can stretch the spinal cord. "According to documented research, autopsy specimens of infant spines and ligaments allow for spinal column elongation of up to two inches, but the spinal cord ruptures if stretched more than 1/4 inch. Real-world experience has shown that a young child's skull can be literally ripped from her spine by the force of a crash." (source: CPSTE ).
If the spinal cord stretches too far in an accident this can cause it to tear, thus resulting in paralysis or death of the child. This is often described as "internal decapitation". Even babies who ‘appear’ to have strong neck muscles and good head control are susceptible to these risks.
Because the vertebrae are still in pieces (joined only by cartilage), a child that is forward-facing faces a heightened risk of damage to the spinal cord when their head and neck pull forward and back in a frontal crash.
Small children also have poorly developed, fragile, flexible neck muscles, loose ligaments to allow for growth, small rib cages, undeveloped abdominal muscles, soft spinal columns and unprotected relatively larger abdominal organs.
At one time, doctors and other organisation's suggested turning infants to the forward facing position at about 6 months. This information is now outdated, 6 months is far too young to turn a child to the forward-facing position. Still, there are some doctors and organisation's repeating this incorrect information because they have been reading old literature, or because they have not been told, or researched otherwise. When and how were the first rear-facing safety seats "born" and how did researchers and experts come to realise its importance?
Infant seats aside, experts and pioneers have been studying the effects of acceleration and deceleration for very many years. One such pioneer was John Stapp. Stapp's life was dedicated to aerospace safety in particular, and safety in general. He was one of the greatest advocates of car safety belts and in his time he was considered a crash safety expert. Dr. Stapps researched deceleration with aid of a rocket sled that consisted of a 680kg carriage mounted on a 610 metre standard gauge railroad track supported on a heavy concrete bed, and a 14 metre mechanical braking system.
"Dr. Stapp's research on the decelerator had profound implications for both civilian and military aviation. For instance, the backward-facing seat concept, which was known previously, was given great impetus by the officer's crash research program, which proved beyond a doubt that this position was the safest for aircraft passengers and required little harness support, and that a human can withstand much greater deceleration than in the forward position. As a result, all of the Air Force Military Air Transportation Service (MATS) were equipped with this type of seat. Commercial airlines were made aware of these findings. The British Royal Air Force also installed it on many of their military transports." (Reference: John Stapp)
"By May 1948 he had taken 16 rides in the backward-facing position, with g stresses up to 35 times the pull of gravity. This was double the stress that had previously been set as the limit of human tolerance. These experiments proved that backward-facing seats would give air transport passengers optimum crash protection." (Reference: Stapp.org) Rear-facing concerns, myths, questions and issues
The legs touching the back of the vehicle seat is not considered a big enough risk to deem rear-facing unsafe and warrant the decision to turn a child forward. Most children, especially long legged children or those over 1 will touch the back of the vehicle seat at some point, this is completely normal and is not regarded as a major safety hazard. Injuries to the lower extremity are usually less severe with fewer long-term complications than injuries to the head, neck or spine, which occur more commonly when a child is seated in the forward-facing position.
Furthermore, a child is not neccessarily "exempt" from injuries to the lower extremity when they are forward-facing. According to research by the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Washington, "Crash reconstruction data demonstrated that the likely mechanism of lower extremity injury was contact between the legs and the front seatbacks. In the CDS database, we identified 15 children with lower extremity injuries in a forward-facing child seat, usually (13 out of 15) placed in the rear seat, incurred in frontal impacts (11 out of 15). Several (5 out of 15) children were in unbelted or improperly secured forward-facing car seats. Injury Severity Scores varied widely (5-50). CONCLUSIONS: Children in forward-facing car seats involved in severe front or rear crashes may incur a range of lower extremity injury from impact with the car interior component in front of them." (Reference: Crash analysis of lower extremity injuries in children restrained in forward-facing car seats during front and rear impacts ).
Additionally - According to research by the Center for Injury Research and Prevention, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine "The lower extremity is among the most frequently injured body regions for children restrained by forward facing child restraint systems (FFCRS), accounting for 28% of their clinically significant injuries, defined as AIS 2 and greater injuries excluding concussions." (Reference: Lower extremity injuries in children seated in forward facing child restraint systems).
Another concern most parents have about their child touching the back of the vehicle seat and bending their knees is whether or not they are really comfortable. It would be never, or at least close to never that you see a child sit on the ground with their legs stretched out straight in front of them, so to the same can be said for when they are rear-facing. They will naturally bend their legs and be quite comfortable doing so.
Furthermore, some forward-facing kids complain of "dead legs" which are sore and uncomfortable because their feet are left "dangling" in the air from being forward-facing and having nothing to rest their feet on.
If your child has grown out of their infant carrier before they are one year of age and you wish to rear-face them for a longer period of time, it is suggested that you move them to a rear-facing convertible car seat. A convertible car seat is one that both rear-faces and forward-faces at a later date (and when they're big enough and ready enough). Convertible car seats are bigger then infant carriers therefore they cater for larger children. Rear-facing convertible car seats often have quite good weight limits for the rear-facing position. However, this is not always the case, see below:
Unfortunately some convertible car seats may only allow you to rear face up to 9 or maybe 10kg. If this is the case for you, then contact the manufacturer of your restraint (if possible) and ask if you can use your restraint for just a little above the rear-facing weight limit and up until your child is one year of age. If this isn't possible then you can purchase a restraint which lets you rear-face for higher weight limits, or you may have to prematurely turn your child to the forward-facing position. If so, at least make sure that at all times you have the upper tether strap installed and used for your restraint.
Even babies who ‘appear’ to have strong neck muscles and good head control are susceptible to the risks of forward-facing prematurely. 'Head control' is not a good indication as to whether or not to turn a child to the forward-facing position.
No, that is not right. Weight alone is not an indication of whether or not to turn your child to the forward-facing position. These weight limits hold no relevance as to how your baby's spine, skeleton, muscles and vertebrae have so far developed, they are merely entry level weight limits.
Everyone has different circumstances and they really need to weigh up the pros and cons. However, what's convenient, doesn't always mean it is best and doesn't change the fact that an infants body is still incredibly undeveloped compared to that of an older child or adult. If your child has remained rear-facing for how ever long so far, then try your best to keep persevering till the very bear minimum of one year of age. If you are considering turning your child because you are worried about not being able to see them, you might want to consider the use of a baby mirror, usually found in baby stores, this mirror will enable you to see your child without having to turn around (just look through the rear view mirror). As for is it dangerous to not be able to see them when you're driving. It is quite possibly dangerous for some children with serious medical conditions (whatever they may be) that need to be closely monitored at all times. However, I don't watch my children when they're sleeping - so why would I need to watch them while they're in the car?
Types of rear-facing seats sold in New Zealand
Video Footage: Side camera Crash test of a Rear-Facing child Overhead view of a Rear-Facing child Is Your Baby Ready to Face Forward in the Car? MSNBC: Toddlers Should Face the Rear Longer Rear-Facing Car Seats: What You Need to Know, by Kathleen Weber Car Time - Stage 1: Safe Travel in a Rear-facing Infant Seat Rear-Facing Car Seat Rules - Why You Should Consider Extended Rear-Facing
Child safety in cars - Literature review Booster Seats - Dr. E.R. Segedin April 2006 SafetyBeltSafe Technical Information (Scroll down to the section on Rear-facing vs. forward-facing) Safety For the Growing Child - Experiences From Swedish Accident Data Danger with children - The researchers' facts about children and car security (Swedish) Land Transport New Zealand - Fitting children into child restraints Pediatric cervical spine injuries: report of 102 cases and review of the literature How Long Should Babies Ride Facing the Back of the Car? National Child Passenger Safety Certification Training Program - Student Manual - April 2007 Rear-Facing - Unmatched Safety
|
|||||||||||